street art

Hello everyone!

So, after our field trip it seems appropriate to take some time and look at what it means to not only inhabit a city, but to experience the city as medium–something to be manipulated, contextualized, and approached on an intimate level.

Public spaces offer anonymity and marginality for artists, something that at first seems contrary to the nature of public space. How does that happen? What mechanisms, social or otherwise, make that the case? Moreover, street art/graffiti offers people the chance to activate their own environment, to remake it and claim it in the face of powerlessness, displacement, and inequality. Graffiti allows people to repossess their environment, own it, and create an individual identity in a collective environment. In that sense, graffiti engages, necessarily, with the sociopolitical fabric of urban life and in doing so, does not merely comment, but physically changes the dynamics of urban structures.

That being said, in the past few years, particularly this past year, more and more museums and galleries have brought street art into their private (and some might say hermetic) spaces to be displayed there. What do you think about that? What do these changes do to the public, political dynamic of the work? Think about how context changes politics and aesthetic choices. What is lost? What is gained?

Below are some videos and interviews with some street artists, some of whom are both participating in museum shows as well as continuing their street work. All of these artists deal with the urban landscape and interact with the built environment. This is a given. However, think about what it is that they are SAYING in relation to that context. Also, given what they have to say, what about the city inspires them to produce what they do?

The first video is an interview with Armsrock, a german artist.
The second video is of GAIA doing a wheatpaste
The third video is of BLU’s animated street art video MUTO
The fourth and fifth videos are a 2 part interview with artist Barry McGee (he animated the interview himself)

Both Armsrock and McGee have both shown in galleries and museums in conjunction with their street art. McGee tags under the moniker TWIST.

BLU did a major street art mural for MOCA LA’s Art in the Street show, but it was torn down amid controversy–a perfect example of the paradox I discussed above.You can find that story here:




One thought on “street art

  1. the more i think about it, the more it seems to me that the context of street art exists mostly as a question rather than as a definitive answer. there are positive and negative consequences for putting it in the street as well as putting it in a gallery. the artist makes the choice, and you could make a case for either place being right or wrong, positive or negative, appropriate or inappropriate. i agree that it seems like a problem that is unique to that kind of work. this article on street artist shepard fairey gets into all the legal trouble he’s experienced while making and displaying his work:

    for me, stories like this really flesh out the complicated nature of this kind of work. for the artist, i don’t think there is an easy answer. while it’s true that the gallery setting removes the work somewhat from that meaningful point of origin, it’s also true that the alternative to that could get you arrested 14 times. again, a case could be made in favor of either one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: